# We Answered The Objections! - "Atheists Can't Answer These 3 Questions!"

- Language: en
- Published: 2026-08-26
- Canonical: https://blog.towardseternity.com/en/blog/we-answered-the-objections-atheists-cant-answer-these-3-questions
- Source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ninWsEQTv0
- Channel: Towards Eternity

This is the cleaned transcript of the source video. The speech is unaltered.

---

assalamu alaikum guys maybe you have heard that our video with the title atheists cannot answer these three questions cut attention a lot atheism a vive that constantly leads you to a dead end while questioning the universe if you haven't watched the first video yet you can watch it first as source eternity we checked some of the comments written by the audience and let's see if they really answer the questions or not before we start the video i want to say we saw that most of the objections will relate to the comparison and analogies but it doesn't make sense we used analogies with the intentional making you better understand the existence of some basic logic rules since analogy is a quite

practical way of conveying ideas and it's kind of magnifier zooming in some distant routes and making them appear more clearly there shouldn't be any problem in using metaphors it's necessary to focus on the meaning given in the example rather than the example okay let's talk about the basic objections we said that one cannot give what one doesn't have to another one one cannot give what one doesn't have to another one for example let's say there are only 100 white balls in a glass sphere what is the chance of a red belt to be chosen from this sphere of course it's zero right no matter how long you wait you will not get any because there is no red bull inside the sphere anyway in summary

atoms don't have any features such as knowledge wheel life feelings vision and hearing so the question is how can atoms give these features to living things so we said that it's so clear that there must be a creator behind atoms and here are some objections atoms gain more properties in the form of molecules already thus it's obvious that the sum is more than the parts when two atoms form a molecule the molecule has a number of properties that neither atoms have fire comes from non-fire oxygen and hydrogen atoms bond to form water which has different attributes from the original atoms seemingly debunking your whole premise ok there are many similar comments but i think these friends didn't

get the points they said that atoms gain new properties when they form molecules okay but our question comes exactly at this point we ask how can it be these friends wrote in the comments again what we presented in the video how can different features arise in molecules and living things when these features do not exist in atoms be honest is it an answer to say but it's constantly happening this is not the question the truth but to imprison the mind to what the eye sees let's say we saw a man who could lift with his hands an enormous building which has 10 floors we would definitely become astonished with that and look for some other cause behind the fact that this man could do it every day

wouldn't just normalize it so it's certainly not an answer to say this happens all the time we say that you have to think about what you see you know if you have black pencil you cannot draw a color for rainbow right just like that hydrogen and oxygen cannot be expected to give water the property that they don't have so we understand logically that they cannot do this job there must be someone who controls this and give these features to living things you only see the image of formation with your eyes in short it's not an answer to say just happens and also it's very sad to see these kind of comments come on you are speaking like you don't know anything about chemistry this process requires

no knowledge or will it just happens does it really just happen is it so why don't you ask why and how the emergence of water with a distinct character is the observed fact for which we want to find an explanation the first question is how can it be the second question is why should even an extinguishing water form after the combination of hydrogen and oxygen is there such a necessity requiring that formation no i mean we can imagine infinite alternative ways of acting for these two elements why not them why this veil acting all the time why not another rule what causes these particles to follow some specific rules and not follow the other infinite possible alternatives at this point only

the concept of will can explain the prevailing of a specific rule among infinite possible alternatives so will is necessary which atoms lack then there has to be an owner or absolute will the second objection is made to the example of judge and prisoner we said that brics cannot form a building by coming together and agreeing there must be an architect to control them think of a building which is being built with bricks if you do not accept the architect to build it it will be a contradiction to accept that brics are building this on their own just like that atoms cannot form a human by coming together and agreeing there must be creator to control them bricks are prisoners architect is judge

atoms are prisoners god is judge ok here are some objections there is no judge or prisoner yet you assume both why is that to assume that everything has ordered and commanded by something is just silly weird question and weird reasoning okay the example we gave was to show a particular condition showing us the existence of a rule and the rule is that two opposite natures cannot come together judge in the comparison stands for the nature of authority and the prisoner stands for the nature of capitality one of them is the subject the active being and the other is its object the passive being and these two natures are totally opposite each other like darkened lights hot and cold existence and

absence just as something cannot be existent or absent at the same time it's also impossible for an atom to give orders and take orders at the same time otherwise the atom will turn out to hold two contradictory natures if all the atoms are considered as the captives of single authority of god there won't be any problem and there is no opposing to logic as the natures are separate and they do not combine but if you don't refer to a gut and say atoms are leading these processes then we will have to accept that an atom is both an authority and a captive at the same time holding through separate natures but this is a contradiction each atom will have a nature of authority similar to god at

figuring all the relations with each other having the knowledge of the whole system of human body commanding and moving which armies of atoms but at the same time these apparently most active beings will be passive and captivated objects in the hands of the other adams everything would be a chaos because a single commander can arrange the affairs of an army with great ease their positions for example but if the soldiers become the commanders themselves no order will be apparent at all now let's pass other objections which says that we ignore and overlook the laws of nature the laws of chemistry okay the first one bricks cannot build because they are lifeless yes i agree with that an

architect is required okay but you can't put atoms and bricks at the same point because there is such a thing as laws of chemistry the second one i have no idea how things like to love chemistry work therefore my gods okay the third one is simple chemistry and physics okay they say the laws of nature help us describe the natural phenomena and the processes and they say that we can explain any natural phenomenon without mentioning god now we should stop here and ask again what do we mean by laws of nature lots of us even don't think about this right laws of nature laws of chemistry laws of physics what sort of being do they have what is their essence and reality in fact it's only knowledge

yes their only knowledge that with discovered they don't even have a material being like this one for example can you show me gravitational force no it's only information it's a name of the movement of substances right but after all they are considered as agents that can have an effect over things they are only description of the order and guts they are creating for example we use grammar rules while writing sentences right for example we use capital letters when starting a sentences this is a rule okay does this rule write a word or does someone write a word with this rule the question is who writes sentences of course grammar rules are just a name of how we write just like that laws of

nature are just a name of how god controls the universe the laws of physics or the laws of chemistry are the names of god's way of ruling the universe the formation of water by the combination of hydrogen and oxygen is a chemical law however it's not the law of chemistry that creates water this law is already the name of the formation it's just a name so it's got who creates water by this rule the constitution of a state can only make known how the country is ruled it cannot rule the country or the no smoking law does not impose any penalties by itself one who puts that law manage the system likewise the laws of nature only describe how god controls the worlds so it's not an answer to say

lasso nature okay these three proofs clearly show us that god exists and these objections don't refute these proofs we will make many videos on these topics we will talk in more detail inshallah and we claim that no objections can refute our approvals don't imprison your minds to your eyes assalamualaikum warahmatullah