Answer To Agnosticism in 1 Minute! - "You Believe in an Imaginary God!"
Published on
this is not your first time here you know the rules you have 60 seconds for each question isn't it more reasonable to focus on information instead of time if you don't want to be timed you can go to our other videos this is cross questioning what is the difference between atheism and agnosticism there are basically two differences while atheism firmly defends the non-existence of a creator agnosticism stays more in the center that is by saying we cannot know for certain either its existence or its non-existence they describe it as unknowable they say that the reason for not knowing is that they cannot observe it physically however people believe in many things that they cannot see for
example compassion everyone believes in it but no one observes it as something concrete the same is true with notions such as justice brotherhood and friendship these are concepts that we cannot see but we believe nonetheless in fact all of us believe things that we do not see but they have doubts about the creator for this reason we can say that agnosticism is wrong why because there is a lot of information out there for example when a police officer does an investigation he collects evidence right for instance he looks at footprints and collects fingerprints after seeing hundreds of pieces of evidence like this he won't say i did not see the criminal therefore he doesn't exist and the
evidence means nothing because we will never know instead he would make a rational deduction after seeing the evidence then he can find the criminal himself based on the evidence so if there is knowledge then uncertainty disappears why can't you stay in the middle isn't it a logical answer to say i don't know no because an attribute does not stay in the air when we see an attribute we must give it to its owner for example if we go to the seaside and see the sun shining on the water we have to attribute the glow to something so we're going to attribute it to the sun we'll either say it's the shining of the sun even though we don't see it or we accept a source such as the sun in all of those
water particles well now this is not something you can stay in the middle for similarly when we look at the universe we see that atoms are at work everywhere but when i examine the atoms i see that they do not have the attributes for example an atom does not look like what i see and an atom does not sound like what i hear well i can't leave these attributes in the air but if i can't see those attributes in atoms when i examine them which i don't then i'll say even if i don't see it i have to accept that there is an entity behind it an entity who has these attributes a creator isn't agnosticism more fair than other fates at least they say that they don't know the other views very clearly
claim its existence or non-existence now for us to say fair there should be no evidence no rational deduction no signs in our hands this time we can say that it is fair but when we look at the universe wherever we look we can see evidence in everything about the existence of a creator allah do you think this makes sense a mother constantly feeds her child takes care of him meets all his needs from infancy to adulthood then when the child grows up he says i do not see compassion materially therefore i cannot know whether my mother is compassionate i can never know this i can't speak for sure about that now should we call this child fair or unfair how can you say that your mother is not
compassionate because you didn't physically see her compassion in other words when everything in the universe is already telling us about allah and we see everything do we call it fair or unfair how can you be 100 sure about the existence of allah even if it's one in a million don't you have any room for error no room for error because while everything shows me the existence of allah i know it's certainty that there are impossibilities regarding his non-existence for example we already talked about his existence do you want to talk about why his non-existence is impossible for example in his absence there will be many contradictions one of them is the judge convict dilemma something cannot
be a judge and a convict at the same time for example when we look at a building it is made of bricks right the bricks are all the same they are made from the same substance now when i look at these bricks if i do not accept an external architect then these bricks can't stack themselves this is because a brick must dominate each of the other bricks absolute judge and at the same time be the absolute convict to each of them why otherwise who will give the command and who will execute the order which brick will control the others how can they take orders from others at the same time so like in this example since there is a judge convict dilemma when i think of atoms in a situation where there
is no creator each atom must be the absolute judge and also the absolute convict so that it can perpetuate this process across the whole universe and manage the system but this is a contradiction so each atom is a convict there must be a creator as in the example of an architect who manages each of them we could talk a lot about this subject but as i said there is a time issue what would you say to those who say you believe in a god that you created in your mind and all of these are just your perceptions now science is subject to knowledge so if there is information then the reality does not change changing my perception or changing my mind will not affect reality for example i closed my
eyes and thought there was a tray here not a table now changing my knowledge changing my perception did not affect reality likewise we are not talking about an illusion in the universe anyway we're talking about many material features that we see we talk about every part of the universe and then we prove the creator now about a person's perception he can say yes or no and make something up in his mind but reality will not change because this is a matter accepted by everyone and witnessed by the universe itself so the existence of a creator is obvious it doesn't change according to the perception of the person this is not very sincere anyway because then one has to say everything is
perception and not move at all for example a person eats when he is hungry he doesn't stop eating and say this is just a perception or similarly he resorts to medicine when he's sick he doesn't say this is perception all of these are perceptions so when it comes to the creator to allah it seems as if there is a trick of the devil and people are being deceived does the delusion of god's non-existence make people leave the religion does it make them agnostic as the name suggests this issue is a delusion it isn't a thought coming from the person's will it's just in the brain this does not harm his faith does not make a person leave the religion we can give you an example take a barcelona fan
now if the real madrid anthem is always playing this person's head would they become a real madrid fan of course not it's just a tune that involuntarily plays in their head it wouldn't change their mind and similarly whispers from the devil such as what if god doesn't exist what if this is not true these uncontrollable thoughts would not change that person's mind and make him leave the religion unless the person accepts adopts and spreads it there would be no problem the important thing is to know that this is a delusion and to research the evidence within islam that's all for our questions next time there will be more difficult questions as i said before there are no hard questions there
are only questions with unknown answers you
example compassion everyone believes in it but no one observes it as something concrete the same is true with notions such as justice brotherhood and friendship these are concepts that we cannot see but we believe nonetheless in fact all of us believe things that we do not see but they have doubts about the creator for this reason we can say that agnosticism is wrong why because there is a lot of information out there for example when a police officer does an investigation he collects evidence right for instance he looks at footprints and collects fingerprints after seeing hundreds of pieces of evidence like this he won't say i did not see the criminal therefore he doesn't exist and the
evidence means nothing because we will never know instead he would make a rational deduction after seeing the evidence then he can find the criminal himself based on the evidence so if there is knowledge then uncertainty disappears why can't you stay in the middle isn't it a logical answer to say i don't know no because an attribute does not stay in the air when we see an attribute we must give it to its owner for example if we go to the seaside and see the sun shining on the water we have to attribute the glow to something so we're going to attribute it to the sun we'll either say it's the shining of the sun even though we don't see it or we accept a source such as the sun in all of those
water particles well now this is not something you can stay in the middle for similarly when we look at the universe we see that atoms are at work everywhere but when i examine the atoms i see that they do not have the attributes for example an atom does not look like what i see and an atom does not sound like what i hear well i can't leave these attributes in the air but if i can't see those attributes in atoms when i examine them which i don't then i'll say even if i don't see it i have to accept that there is an entity behind it an entity who has these attributes a creator isn't agnosticism more fair than other fates at least they say that they don't know the other views very clearly
claim its existence or non-existence now for us to say fair there should be no evidence no rational deduction no signs in our hands this time we can say that it is fair but when we look at the universe wherever we look we can see evidence in everything about the existence of a creator allah do you think this makes sense a mother constantly feeds her child takes care of him meets all his needs from infancy to adulthood then when the child grows up he says i do not see compassion materially therefore i cannot know whether my mother is compassionate i can never know this i can't speak for sure about that now should we call this child fair or unfair how can you say that your mother is not
compassionate because you didn't physically see her compassion in other words when everything in the universe is already telling us about allah and we see everything do we call it fair or unfair how can you be 100 sure about the existence of allah even if it's one in a million don't you have any room for error no room for error because while everything shows me the existence of allah i know it's certainty that there are impossibilities regarding his non-existence for example we already talked about his existence do you want to talk about why his non-existence is impossible for example in his absence there will be many contradictions one of them is the judge convict dilemma something cannot
be a judge and a convict at the same time for example when we look at a building it is made of bricks right the bricks are all the same they are made from the same substance now when i look at these bricks if i do not accept an external architect then these bricks can't stack themselves this is because a brick must dominate each of the other bricks absolute judge and at the same time be the absolute convict to each of them why otherwise who will give the command and who will execute the order which brick will control the others how can they take orders from others at the same time so like in this example since there is a judge convict dilemma when i think of atoms in a situation where there
is no creator each atom must be the absolute judge and also the absolute convict so that it can perpetuate this process across the whole universe and manage the system but this is a contradiction so each atom is a convict there must be a creator as in the example of an architect who manages each of them we could talk a lot about this subject but as i said there is a time issue what would you say to those who say you believe in a god that you created in your mind and all of these are just your perceptions now science is subject to knowledge so if there is information then the reality does not change changing my perception or changing my mind will not affect reality for example i closed my
eyes and thought there was a tray here not a table now changing my knowledge changing my perception did not affect reality likewise we are not talking about an illusion in the universe anyway we're talking about many material features that we see we talk about every part of the universe and then we prove the creator now about a person's perception he can say yes or no and make something up in his mind but reality will not change because this is a matter accepted by everyone and witnessed by the universe itself so the existence of a creator is obvious it doesn't change according to the perception of the person this is not very sincere anyway because then one has to say everything is
perception and not move at all for example a person eats when he is hungry he doesn't stop eating and say this is just a perception or similarly he resorts to medicine when he's sick he doesn't say this is perception all of these are perceptions so when it comes to the creator to allah it seems as if there is a trick of the devil and people are being deceived does the delusion of god's non-existence make people leave the religion does it make them agnostic as the name suggests this issue is a delusion it isn't a thought coming from the person's will it's just in the brain this does not harm his faith does not make a person leave the religion we can give you an example take a barcelona fan
now if the real madrid anthem is always playing this person's head would they become a real madrid fan of course not it's just a tune that involuntarily plays in their head it wouldn't change their mind and similarly whispers from the devil such as what if god doesn't exist what if this is not true these uncontrollable thoughts would not change that person's mind and make him leave the religion unless the person accepts adopts and spreads it there would be no problem the important thing is to know that this is a delusion and to research the evidence within islam that's all for our questions next time there will be more difficult questions as i said before there are no hard questions there
are only questions with unknown answers you